From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:00:56 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-13 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vm2g9v$1moco$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-12 22:48, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
>>>
>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
>>>> levels, do you?
>>>
>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
>>
>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>>
>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
>> water pressure.
>
> They were empty.
No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
...but that's not the same thing.
>>
>>>
>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
>>>
>>> Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
>>> CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
>>> long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
>>> of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
>>>
>>> Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
>>
>> You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
>> against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
>>
>> <https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
>>
>>>
>>> California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
>>> budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
>>
>> Not germane to this discussion.
>
> It shows how incompatant they are.
I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
incompetence of the governing party...
...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
:-)
>>
>>>
>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
>>>
>>> If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
>>> California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
>>> taboo for YOU to care about it?
>> You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
>> record-setting amount of rainfall.
>
> Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
Nope. Big projects take TIME.
That's just a fact.