From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:23:18 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
> >
> >>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
> >>
> >> The reservoirs aren't empty.
> >
> > But the hydrants were.
>
> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
> same time.
>
> >
> >> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> >> water pressure.
> >
> > Non-sequitur.
> >
> > If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
>
> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
>
> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?