From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:22:11 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm44u6$222t5$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-13 14:23, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
> >>>
> >>> But the hydrants were.
> >>
> >> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
> >> same time.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> >>>> water pressure.
> >>>
> >>> Non-sequitur.
> >>>
> >>> If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
> >>
> >> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
> >>
> >> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
> >> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
> >
> > They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
>
> How did they "fuck up"?
>
> Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.