From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:26:33 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-13 15:20, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-01-13, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-13 15:02, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-13, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the hydrants were.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
>>>>> same time.
>>>>> Jennifer Rubin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
>>>>>>> water pressure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Non-sequitur.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
>>>>>
>>>>> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
>>>>> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
>>>>
>>>> They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
>>>
>>> For the same reason the libbys claimed:
>>>
>>> 1. The Hunter laptop was a fake.
>>
>> While the laptop may (MAY!) have belonged to him at one point, that's a
>> far cry from all the information on it being accurate.
>>
>>> 2. Joe Biden had no cognitive issues.
>>
>> And Trump?
>>
>>> 3. Videos of Biden wandering around, getting lost, shaking hands with the air
>>> were cheap fakes.
>>
>> Why don't you stick to the facts?
>>
>> Do you think the city infrastructure built over 100+ years can all be
>> torn up at once?
>
> Just like I said in the other thread, libbys will move the goalposts
> and head into the weeds.
>
> Thank you for proving my point.
>
My comments are right on point, liar.
The discussion is about why it is the ultra-extreme utilization of city
hydrants might lead to low pressure.