From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:27:43 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-13 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vm44u6$222t5$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-13 14:23, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the hydrants were.
>>>>
>>>> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
>>>> same time.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
>>>>>> water pressure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-sequitur.
>>>>>
>>>>> If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
>>>>
>>>> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
>>>>
>>>> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
>>>> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
>>>
>>> They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
>>
>> How did they "fuck up"?
>>
>> Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
>
> I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
:-)