Davin News Server

On 2025-01-13 15:26, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vm45eb$222r3$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-12 13:40, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vlvdvg$10qqb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-11 18:18, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vlv3lf$rdh9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-11 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vlsp95$f2dr$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 19:19, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vlsikg$a24b$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vls99q$949p$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 14:55, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vls66n$8671$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 13:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vls341$7v2g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 13:15, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlrjpi$55to$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlq32k$3p6o6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 16:00, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlpkia$3j1gc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 14:56, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlp7lf$3gfj7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 05:34, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 16:47, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmcoi$2sp2o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 09:27, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmaia$2sa75$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 05:53, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay the standard penalty before release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you agree no crimes were committed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> punishment match the "crimes"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given due process are a different situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around outside"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't buy into anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Extraordinary claims require support.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you never provide.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, just to shut the libbys upone more time:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q?si=MvTgeMACRZNS-Cy8>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should read before you post...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...assuming you know HOW to read:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the left wing media station is feeding you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to save one's skin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for whatever reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and was told multiple times to get back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He got a promotion for his "work".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As your kind likes to say when innocent black people get shot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "She should have complied".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was murdered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window, you'd say the killing was justified.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I saw the footage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they chose to murder her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was the one trying to come through the window...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's your work to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. You command nothing from me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...where there were legislators sheltering...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This video shows it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no one else got shot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No one else tried to come through the window.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for the unarmed black men...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who were they? Are they in the video?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store, you'd call it self-defense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
>>>>>>>>>>> brought it up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's why I'm ASKING you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You tried to spin it around and put race into it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
>>>>>>>>>>>> persons is not?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
>>>>>>>>>>> What black people? She was murdered.
>>>>>>>>>> She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. They let them in.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They weren't letting them in to the "Speaker Lobby".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The doors were barricaded and the mob was breaking the windows to get
>>>>>>>> through.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
>>>>>>>>>> shot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why just her?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She was the one climbing through.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unarmed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's never bothered you before.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who have I shot stupid?
>>>>
>>>> Not what I was talking about...
>>>
>>> Then what the hell were you talking about?
>>
>> You figure it out.
> 
> Stop drinking that cheap Canadian rotgut so early. It shows.

Just giving you back what you like to serve up to others.

:-)