From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:32:24 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-13 15:29, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-01-13, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <vm44ss$222t5$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>
>>> On 2025-01-13 14:22, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <vm42eo$222t5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-13 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vm2g9v$1moco$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-12 22:48, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
>>>>>>>>> levels, do you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
>>>>>>> water pressure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They were empty.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
>>>>> many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...but that's not the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
>>>>>>>> CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
>>>>>>>> long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
>>>>>>>> of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
>>>>>>> against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
>>>>>>>> budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not germane to this discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It shows how incompatant they are.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
>>>>> incompetence of the governing party...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
>>>>>>>> California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
>>>>>>>> taboo for YOU to care about it?
>>>>>>> You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
>>>>>>> record-setting amount of rainfall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
>>>>> Nope. Big projects take TIME.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's just a fact.
>>>>
>>>> Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
>>>
>>> Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
>>
>> Yup
>>>
>>> That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
>>
>> It was the main one for that area.
>>>
>>> ...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
>>>
>>> It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
>>> counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
>>> pretty small one at that.
>>
>>
>> It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
>> need electricity to pump some of that water.
>>
>>
> There are so many bad decisions that were made in CA that it's difficult to
> even keep track of them.
Name one.
> The libbys are trying in vain to defend these libtard and DEI hires and their
> incompetence but it's impossible.
> The media is also trying to take the focus off poor policy decisions but
> it's not working.
Name one such decision.
>
> Sadly, as bad and horrible this situation is for a large number of people,
> CA will probably still stay blue because they hate the republicans even more
> than they hate their own politicians whose poor decision making have caused
> this mess.
You realize that the blue states subsidize the red states...
...right?