From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: LOL - When Narcissists Can NOT Admit They've Been Beaten And Hornswoggled
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:11:14 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:15:06 -0800, Alan says...
> > There WAS no "inaccuracy". It was a plant and trap, and you fell for
> > it, Mr. NOT Perfect.
>
> Bullshit.
LOL
Denial. A narcissist's first resort on his road to accepting that he has a problem with himself and those he's lost.
You'll get there, gayboy.
1) Denial
2) Anger
3) Bargaining
4) Depression
5) Acceptance
Told you faggot... I HAVE the CO² levels going back to 1850. KNOWING the level of the year I spoke of...
You just can't STAND it that I set you up and you fell for it.
I add shit like that all the time, JUST so you'll ignore the topic and focus on the mundane and shit that doesn't matter nearly HALF as much as the
topic.
Poor wittle narcissist...
... prolly got no sleep last night.
Oh... and let us not forget the topic, if you'd like to comment on that... alone. Otherwise...
PLONK!
=====
When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today - Sorry Shitstains... You're Wrong... Again
Date: 01/11/25 09:25 PM
"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=medium
=====
As you can see... THAT was my original post.
I decided to troll your pedantic ass and posted it again, but with a revised title... JUST for you.
=====
When CO2 Was Nearly HALF What It Is Today - Sorry Shitstains... You're Wrong... Again
Date: 01/11/25 09:25 PM
"CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL"
LOS ANGELES, Nov. 24, 1938-(U.P.) - Eight brush fires, fanned by high, dry winds from the Nevada desert, were out of control in Southern California
today after burning over 50,000 acres of land and destroying more than 600 homes."
https://newspapers.com/image/740269701/
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gg-NRqnbQAAir-Q?format=jpg&name=large
THIS one was JUST for you.
LOL
============================================================================
Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO
This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong
They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.
But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to explain:
They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem
For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences associated with loss or
failure," says Sharp.
"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as an inherent character fault,"
he explains.
Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their screw-ups are unforgivable.
"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the time, or not even try or make
it seem as if I am'" he says.
Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger
For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good leader admits their mistakes.
"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being fallible tend to be more highly
regarded," the expert explains.
"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's pretty hard to believe," says
the psychologist.
(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)
"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.
Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm sorry but I'll try to fix
it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."
They Don't Value The Truth
(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)
For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.
"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a reality, is that Alan doesn't
value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.
Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value facts. When it comes to the truth,
the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"
"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.
Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will often reveal whether facts or
feelings will influence them more.
"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains. "Other people make their decisions
based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking
different languages.