From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:26:12 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm47jd$23209$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-13 15:21, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vm44ss$222t5$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-13 14:22, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vm42eo$222t5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-13 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vm2g9v$1moco$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-12 22:48, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
> >>>>>>>> levels, do you?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> >>>>>> water pressure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They were empty.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, they weren't. Pressures were very low at hydrants because of how
> >>>> many were attempting to be used simultaneously...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...but that's not the same thing.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
> >>>>>>> CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
> >>>>>>> long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
> >>>>>>> of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
> >>>>>> against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
> >>>>>>> budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not germane to this discussion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It shows how incompatant they are.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll remember that you claim that the size of the debt is related to the
> >>>> incompetence of the governing party...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...when Trump's budgets come in again with larger debt/deficits.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
> >>>>>>> California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
> >>>>>>> taboo for YOU to care about it?
> >>>>>> You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
> >>>>>> record-setting amount of rainfall.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.
> >>>> Nope. Big projects take TIME.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's just a fact.
> >>>
> >>> Pictures of the main one empty. It was "off line:.
> >>
> >> Picture of the "main one" what? Reservoir.
> >
> > Yup
> >>
> >> That was ONE reservoir out of many and it needed repair...
> >
> > It was the main one for that area.
>
> Nope. Not even close.
>
> >>
> >> ...and it wasn't the "main one" at all.
> >>
> >> It was ONE reservoir of many that serve Los Angeles (22 in all, not
> >> counting ones outside LA County), and from what I'm seeing, it was a
> >> pretty small one at that.
> >
> >
> > It should have been full. They were warned what was coming. You also
> > need electricity to pump some of that water.
> It was shut down AGES ago for repair.
>
> And now you're bringing up electricity as an issue?
>
> Why?
Are you that stupid?