From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:32:24 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm47hg$23209$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-13 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vm44u6$222t5$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-13 14:23, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But the hydrants were.
> >>>>
> >>>> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
> >>>> same time.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> >>>>>> water pressure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Non-sequitur.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
> >>>>
> >>>> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
> >>>>
> >>>> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
> >>>> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
> >>>
> >>> They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
> >>
> >> How did they "fuck up"?
> >>
> >> Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
> >
> > I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
>
> They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
>
> But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
>
> :-)
You look it up. They didn't. Even the people who live there say so.