From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat queers failed to have enough water to fight fires
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 12:31:12 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-14 08:34, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vm47dn$23209$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-13 15:23, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vm44ur$222t5$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-13 14:21, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vm429i$222t5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 12:43, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vm3r0v$20lk2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 10:50, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vm3gg5$1s95n$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 06:44, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1mja$1fl7u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-12 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1eql$1ecr8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-12 13:31, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1129$17hdr$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-11 18:56, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would have been without it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhhh... no.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you? They fucked up. No water.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes even they admit it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Show the quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Go find it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you can't show it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Got it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
>>>>>>>>> your friend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
>>>>>>>> right on lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They admitted it. You know this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. I know no such thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You claim they've admitted it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
>>>
>>> Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
>>
>> You're lying.
>>
>> I'm very careful to leave in all the context of that to which I'm replying.
>
> and to snip that which you choose to ignore.
So what?