From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:48:21 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-14 08:32, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vm47hg$23209$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-13 15:22, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vm44u6$222t5$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-13 14:23, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vm42su$222t5$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 05:54, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Better than empty fire hydrants.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the hydrants were.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. The pressure was just very low because so many were in use at the
>>>>>> same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
>>>>>>>> water pressure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Non-sequitur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When would this "planning" have had to happen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How much of the city would have needed to be torn up to put in pipes
>>>>>> large enough to run hundreds of hydrants simultaneously?
>>>>>
>>>>> They fucked up. Why do you defend the kooks?
>>>>
>>>> How did they "fuck up"?
>>>>
>>>> Do you understanding anything at all about hydrodynamics?
>>>
>>> I know they didn't do forest management or have enough water.
>>
>> They absolutely do do both forest management and they have enough water.
>>
>> But feel free to show your sources that say differently.
>>
>> :-)
>
> You look it up. They didn't. Even the people who live there say so.
And yet you can't produce a single source...