From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat queers failed to have enough water to fight fires
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:21:53 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm6hig$2iobi$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-14 08:34, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vm47dn$23209$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-13 15:23, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vm44ur$222t5$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-13 14:21, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vm429i$222t5$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-13 12:43, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vm3r0v$20lk2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 10:50, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vm3gg5$1s95n$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-13 06:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1mja$1fl7u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-12 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1eql$1ecr8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-12 13:31, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vm1129$17hdr$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-11 18:56, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500, kensi says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would have been without it:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhhh... no.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you? They fucked up. No water.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> False.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes even they admit it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Show the quote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Go find it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So you can't show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Got it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
> >>>>>>>>> your friend.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You're lying.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go
> >>>>>>>> right on lying.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They admitted it. You know this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. I know no such thing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You claim they've admitted it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> PRODUCE THE SOURCE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When you stop snipping and play honest I might.
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't snipped a word you've said in this subthread.
> >>>
> >>> Not this one but many others at the atart. I told you then.
> >>
> >> You're lying.
> >>
> >> I'm very careful to leave in all the context of that to which I'm replying.
> >
> > and to snip that which you choose to ignore.
>
> So what?
Typical liberal tactic.