From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: More Of The Same Ole Shit - Can't Generate Enough Energy With Solar And Wind, So Use DIESEL To Charge EVs
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:43:39 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vme5m0$56dn$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-16 23:09, JTEM wrote:
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> >> On 2025-01-16 22:46, JTEM wrote:
> >>> On 1/16/25 10:36 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> But I'm not the conjuring up stories.
> >>>
> >>> I'm glad you're saying this in reaction to a video demonstrating
> >>> that it's real, so that none of the irony was lost.
> >>>
> >>> The energy infrastructure -- the grid -- can't handle a switch
> >>> to EVs, and especially fast charging stations. Your house isn't
> >>> even capable of handling the level of power in ONE fast charging
> >>> station!
> >>>
> >>> Secondly, look at the video, you mouth breathing ignoramus. It's
> >>> clearly winter, and as energy hungry EVs and their power stations
> >>> are they're even more power hungry in cold weather. So you have
> >>> a demand for power PER STATION that's greater than any home can
> >>> handle, multiple stations, plus we're talking trucks not cars
> >>> AND it's cold.
> >>>
> >>> I sincerely doubt they could get buy without the diesel
> >>> generator in good weather! I'm kind of surprised that they can
> >>> make do with only one in the cold.
> >
> >> Wow. The number of utterly unsupported assertions in here...
> >
> > Zero, precisely.
>
> Which is why you had to snip my text rather than rebut it.
Oh the irony.
>
> >
> > There are ZERO unsupported assertions. If you meant "Uncited" then
> > there's an easy fix: Pull up Google. Because THAT'S what people
> > who want to know things do.
> >
> > Well. Not necessarily Google. I mean they LOOK, they RESEARCH and
> > they don't just squat in their own bodily waste as you do, demanding
> > that other produce cites which you have never once ever accepted.
> >
> > Here. I'll prove it:
> >
> >
> > How is your position going to CHANGE, what will your apology be if
> > I produce any cites proving you entirely wrong here, and proving
> > everything I just said a fact?
> >
> > How does YOUR position CHANGE?
> >
> > Because it's never changed before, never so much as altered...
> I see a lot of dodging, but you never produce cites, so it hardly matters.
>
> But if you produce cites that show this trailer is a permanent thing,
> I'll admit I was wrong.