From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: LeftTards lie: Re: Trump Pardons Convicted Cop Killers
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:19:57 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-26 07:43, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:07:23 -0800, Alan says...
>
>>> That's an OPINION by a writer at the Wapo, NOT from Diaz.
>>
>> No. It is a QUOTE of what Diaz said.
>>
>
> No... that's Wapo "journalist" "SAYING" he said that. Why is the
> quote cut off? Because it's probably not a REAL quote, but what the
> "journalist THINKS he meant, but probably didn't actually say.. Many
> times, when journalists put words in quotation marks, they're
> IMPLYING what THEY think the person to whom they're quoting,
> meant... not actually said.
>
> Did Diaz say those EXACT words?
Yes. That's what the quotation marks around them mean.
> Then, WHY is it a truncated
> sentence?
>
> Direct quotes use the exact words of a speaker. Use direct quotes:
> if exact language is needed for clarity
>
> INDIRECT quotes involve RE-WORDING AND REPHRASING A QUOTE without
> changing the meaning. Use a paraphrase to accurately portray the
> meaning of a quote in a more efficient manner.
No. That is bullshit. You shouldn't use AI to source this stuff.
This was a direct quote.
>
> Now... is "all that transpired played a role in his condition" a
> DIRECT quote, or an INDIRECT quote.
>
> Show us another source... and NOT just the Wapo pansy-ass
> journalist's.
>
> LOL... don't bother... they ALL use the same INDIRECT quote... NEVER
> a full quote.
"full" and "indirect" are not opposites.
>
> No full quotes, means it's an indirect fabricated quote...
> fabricated out of more words that MAY have not had the same meaning
> and spin, as the journalists have put on it.
>
> Not ONE full quote from ANY source. The same quote is used by all
> sources, and not ONE of them, is a "full quote".
>
> They ALL say the same thing, because they do NOT have a full quote
> from the M.E. that SAYS he suffered the strokes BECAUSE of the Bear
> Spray and/or what "transpired". LOL
You are hilarious.
First you said it wasn't a clot.
Then you said you meant he didn't get the clot on Jan 6.
Then you went back to claiming it wasn't a clot and I had to show you a
second time that "thrombosis" means "clot".
Now you're desperate to pretend that what Diaz said isn't what he said,
and making up stuff to try to muddy the waters.