From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: LeftTards lie: Re: Trump Pardons Convicted Cop Killers
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 16:43:13 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vn8vb9$18nk5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-27 13:23, pothead wrote:
> > On 2025-01-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <vn41p6$36ocn$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On 2025-01-25 04:39, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>> In article <vn0nh4$2c21c$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2025-01-24 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vn0kp2$2aj9r$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 08:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vmujjh$1s0lt$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But STILL no murder charges.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, that will be all, boy.
> >>>>>>>>> But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She wasn't innocent.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So? She was unarmed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So? She was breaking into an area where people were sheltering from a
> >>>>> mob. If she'd been there all by herself, things would have been
> >>>>> different and you know it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unarmed. Murder. Simple as that.
> >>>
> >>> Nope. That is simply not the case.
> >>
> >> Sure was. If someone tried to break into my house unarmed and I shot
> >> them I would go to jail.
> >
> > Where I live I would need to demonstrate imminent bodily harm. So
> > basically I neutralized the intruder based upon threats and a "It's you
> > or me" type situation.
>
> Where do you live? You don't have to give your street address; just the
> jurisdiction.
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law#United_States>
>
> 'Washington, D.C. adopts a "middle ground" approach, under which "The
> law does not require a person to retreat," but "in deciding whether
> [defendant] reasonably at the time of the incident believed that s/he
> was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm and that deadly
> force was necessary to repel that danger, you may consider, along with
> any other evidence, whether the [defendant] could have safely retreated
> ... but did not."'
>
> To where could Byrd and the people he was protecting have "safely
> retreated"?
>
> >
> > Someone trying to pry open a window without a threat either spoken or
> > demonstrated, ie:pointing a weapon at the homeowner, does not qualify.
> > Nor should it.
>
> This was beyond just trying to pry open a window, and there were most
> definitely threats made.
>
> >
> > If I were in such a situation, one on one, I would point my weapon, yell loudly
> > that the police are on their way and if you do not leave immediately, I will shoot you.
> > In all likelihood that would take care of the vast majority of encounters like this.
> And the police officer in this case did just that: yell.
>
> "Babbitt had been warned not to proceed through the window: one witness
> recalled that "A number of police and Secret Service were saying 'Get
> back! Get down! Get out of the way!'"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCuIxBzylyo>
Stalking noted.