From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: LeftTards lie: Re: Trump Pardons Convicted Cop Killers
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:50:40 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-27 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vn8vb9$18nk5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-27 13:23, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <vn41p6$36ocn$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-25 04:39, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vn0nh4$2c21c$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vn0kp2$2aj9r$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 08:48, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmujjh$1s0lt$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But STILL no murder charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, that will be all, boy.
>>>>>>>>>>> But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She wasn't innocent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So? She was unarmed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So? She was breaking into an area where people were sheltering from a
>>>>>>> mob. If she'd been there all by herself, things would have been
>>>>>>> different and you know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unarmed. Murder. Simple as that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. That is simply not the case.
>>>>
>>>> Sure was. If someone tried to break into my house unarmed and I shot
>>>> them I would go to jail.
>>>
>>> Where I live I would need to demonstrate imminent bodily harm. So
>>> basically I neutralized the intruder based upon threats and a "It's you
>>> or me" type situation.
>>
>> Where do you live? You don't have to give your street address; just the
>> jurisdiction.
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law#United_States>
>>
>> 'Washington, D.C. adopts a "middle ground" approach, under which "The
>> law does not require a person to retreat," but "in deciding whether
>> [defendant] reasonably at the time of the incident believed that s/he
>> was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm and that deadly
>> force was necessary to repel that danger, you may consider, along with
>> any other evidence, whether the [defendant] could have safely retreated
>> ... but did not."'
>>
>> To where could Byrd and the people he was protecting have "safely
>> retreated"?
>>
>>>
>>> Someone trying to pry open a window without a threat either spoken or
>>> demonstrated, ie:pointing a weapon at the homeowner, does not qualify.
>>> Nor should it.
>>
>> This was beyond just trying to pry open a window, and there were most
>> definitely threats made.
>>
>>>
>>> If I were in such a situation, one on one, I would point my weapon, yell loudly
>>> that the police are on their way and if you do not leave immediately, I will shoot you.
>>> In all likelihood that would take care of the vast majority of encounters like this.
>> And the police officer in this case did just that: yell.
>>
>> "Babbitt had been warned not to proceed through the window: one witness
>> recalled that "A number of police and Secret Service were saying 'Get
>> back! Get down! Get out of the way!'"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCuIxBzylyo>
>
> Stalking noted.
What "stalking"?