From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:38:25 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
> >>>>> me.
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
> >>>>
> >>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
> >>>
> >>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
> >>
> >> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
> >
> > So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
>
> "Almost hit"?
>
> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.