Davin News Server

In article <vn964g$1avck$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-27 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vn8vb9$18nk5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-27 13:23, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2025-01-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article <vn41p6$36ocn$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2025-01-25 04:39, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vn0nh4$2c21c$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vn0kp2$2aj9r$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 08:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vmujjh$1s0lt$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But STILL no murder charges.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, that will be all, boy.
> >>>>>>>>>>> But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She wasn't innocent.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So? She was unarmed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So? She was breaking into an area where people were sheltering from a
> >>>>>>> mob. If she'd been there all by herself, things would have been
> >>>>>>> different and you know it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unarmed. Murder. Simple as that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nope. That is simply not the case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure was. If someone tried to break into my house unarmed and I shot
> >>>> them I would go to jail.
> >>>
> >>> Where I live I would need to demonstrate imminent bodily harm. So
> >>> basically I neutralized the intruder based upon threats and a "It's you
> >>> or me" type situation.
> >>
> >> Where do you live? You don't have to give your street address; just the
> >> jurisdiction.
> >>
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law#United_States>
> >>
> >> 'Washington, D.C. adopts a "middle ground" approach, under which "The
> >> law does not require a person to retreat," but "in deciding whether
> >> [defendant] reasonably at the time of the incident believed that s/he
> >> was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm and that deadly
> >> force was necessary to repel that danger, you may consider, along with
> >> any other evidence, whether the [defendant] could have safely retreated
> >> ... but did not."'
> >>
> >> To where could Byrd and the people he was protecting have "safely
> >> retreated"?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Someone trying to pry open a window without a threat either spoken or
> >>> demonstrated, ie:pointing a weapon at the homeowner, does not qualify.
> >>> Nor should it.
> >>
> >> This was beyond just trying to pry open a window, and there were most
> >> definitely threats made.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If I were in such a situation, one on one, I would point my weapon, yell loudly
> >>> that the police are on their way and if you do not leave immediately, I will shoot you.
> >>> In all likelihood that would take care of the vast majority of encounters like this.
> >> And the police officer in this case did just that: yell.
> >>
> >> "Babbitt had been warned not to proceed through the window: one witness
> >> recalled that "A number of police and Secret Service were saying 'Get
> >> back! Get down! Get out of the way!'"
> >>
> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCuIxBzylyo>
> > 
> > Stalking noted.
> 
> What "stalking"?

Watch yourself. They are coming and you will be our 51st state.