Davin News Server

On 2025-01-27 16:39, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vn964g$1avck$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-27 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vn8vb9$18nk5$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-27 13:23, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vn41p6$36ocn$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 04:39, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vn0nh4$2c21c$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn0kp2$2aj9r$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-24 08:48, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmujjh$1s0lt$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:48:59 -0800,  Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?all that transpired played a role in his condition.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But STILL no murder charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, that will be all, boy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But still not exactly JUST natural causes as you claimed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No murder except for the innocent unarmed girl.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She wasn't innocent.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She was breaking through a door via a broken window.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So? She was unarmed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So? She was breaking into an area where people were sheltering from a
>>>>>>>>> mob. If she'd been there all by herself, things would have been
>>>>>>>>> different and you know it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unarmed. Murder. Simple as that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. That is simply not the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure was. If someone tried to break into my house unarmed and I shot
>>>>>> them I would go to jail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where I live I would need to demonstrate imminent bodily harm. So
>>>>> basically I neutralized the intruder based upon threats and a "It's you
>>>>> or me" type situation.
>>>>
>>>> Where do you live? You don't have to give your street address; just the
>>>> jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law#United_States>
>>>>
>>>> 'Washington, D.C. adopts a "middle ground" approach, under which "The
>>>> law does not require a person to retreat," but "in deciding whether
>>>> [defendant] reasonably at the time of the incident believed that s/he
>>>> was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm and that deadly
>>>> force was necessary to repel that danger, you may consider, along with
>>>> any other evidence, whether the [defendant] could have safely retreated
>>>> ... but did not."'
>>>>
>>>> To where could Byrd and the people he was protecting have "safely
>>>> retreated"?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone trying to pry open a window without a threat either spoken or
>>>>> demonstrated, ie:pointing a weapon at the homeowner, does not qualify.
>>>>> Nor should it.
>>>>
>>>> This was beyond just trying to pry open a window, and there were most
>>>> definitely threats made.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If I were in such a situation, one on one, I would point my weapon, yell loudly
>>>>> that the police are on their way and if you do not leave immediately, I will shoot you.
>>>>> In all likelihood that would take care of the vast majority of encounters like this.
>>>> And the police officer in this case did just that: yell.
>>>>
>>>> "Babbitt had been warned not to proceed through the window: one witness
>>>> recalled that "A number of police and Secret Service were saying 'Get
>>>> back! Get down! Get out of the way!'"
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCuIxBzylyo>
>>>
>>> Stalking noted.
>>
>> What "stalking"?
> 
> Watch yourself. They are coming and you will be our 51st state.

Keep dreaming.

Now answer my question.