From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 06:12:51 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
> >>>>>>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Almost hit"?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
> >>>>
> >>>> You said he was "almost hit".
> >>>>
> >>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's not twisting words by me.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
> >>>
> >>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
> >>> to get that close?
> >>
> >> Answer yes or no:
> >>
> >> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
> >
> > No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
>
> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
Would you?