From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:23:18 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
>>>>> to get that close?
>>>>
>>>> Answer yes or no:
>>>>
>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
>>>
>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
>>
>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
>
> Would you?
You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.