Davin News Server

On 2025-01-29 13:04, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vndklm$28p47$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
>>>>>>> to get that close?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Answer yes or no:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
>>>>>
>>>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
>>>>
>>>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
>>>
>>> Would you?
>>
>> You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
>>
>> Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.
> 
> No I didn't. I said would he take that chance if it was a set up and
> tell the guy to almost hit him. You are just like the MSM, you spin and
> take out of context. Now tell me how he set it up.

I don't have to.

I just look at the evidence that his ear wasn't shot.

On July 26, 2024:

'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked
  @realDonaldTrump about his bullet wound as they walked to their 
meeting at Mar-a-lago. Former President Trump showed him where he was hit.'

That's 13 days after he was supposedly hit with a bullet that "produced 
a 2 cm wide wound" (that's his personal lackey/doctor Ronny Jackson).

Here's the pic:

<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>

And explain why one of the Secret Service agents rushed to the stage...

...with a hand towel.

How did he know one would be needed? Why would it be a priority to wipe 
the blood from Trump's face...

...rather than getting him off the stage as quickly as possible?