Davin News Server

On 1/29/25 4:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vndt2j$2gd8l$2@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 1/29/25 12:14 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
>>>>>
>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
>>> was it a set up?
>>
>> Where's the video showing blood splatter before he reached his hand up?
>>
>> What's your explanation for why the evidence in the days after that
>> there was no wound on the ear?
>>
>> There is no evidence that he was struck in the ear that day by a bullet
>> as he has claimed, and there's evidence that the claim isn't credible.
>>
>> For an explanation that fits the known facts, a setup is a possibility.
>> There could be other explanations that also don't require a bullet
>> impact, so go ahead and make your own, less damning suggestion.  Good
>> luck in making them as credible (FYI: a laceration from a flying glass
>> shard also leaves blood dispersion evidence prior to hand-raising).
>>
>>
>> -hh
> 
> They tried to kill him and failed. 

You don't have proof of that.

> It was not faked. 

The evidence doesn't support what they've told the gullible public.

> You lost and he won.

You're trying to change the subject.


-hh