From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:14:43 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-29 16:01, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vnec9q$2he17$7@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 1/29/25 4:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vndt2j$2gd8l$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 1/29/25 12:14 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal. Post pics of it at the start, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get. We'll wait.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:Â was it
>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):Â that's a
>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
>>>>>> brush-off attempt. He's just trying to save face while hoping that
>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
>>>>> was it a set up?
>>>>
>>>> Where's the video showing blood splatter before he reached his hand up?
>>>>
>>>> What's your explanation for why the evidence in the days after that
>>>> there was no wound on the ear?
>>>>
>>>> There is no evidence that he was struck in the ear that day by a bullet
>>>> as he has claimed, and there's evidence that the claim isn't credible.
>>>>
>>>> For an explanation that fits the known facts, a setup is a possibility.
>>>> There could be other explanations that also don't require a bullet
>>>> impact, so go ahead and make your own, less damning suggestion. Good
>>>> luck in making them as credible (FYI: a laceration from a flying glass
>>>> shard also leaves blood dispersion evidence prior to hand-raising).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> They tried to kill him and failed.
>>
>> You don't have proof of that.
>
> and you don't have proof they didn't.
I have the pictures that show his ear wasn't injured:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
>>
>>> It was not faked.
>>
>> The evidence doesn't support what they've told the gullible public.
>
> People died. You are getting stale at this.
That people died doesn't support that Trump was never hit.
>>
>>> You lost and he won.
>>
>> You're trying to change the subject.
>
> Oh the irony. It wasn't faked.
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>