Davin News Server

From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 22:10:52 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 1/29/25 7:11 PM, Alan wrote:
> On 2025-01-29 15:57, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <vnedmo$2he17$10@dont-email.me>,
>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>
>>> On 1/29/25 5:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <vne6g5$2i969$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:04, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vndklm$28p47$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like a conspiracy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooter into a "they".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could die?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he 
>>>>>>>>>>>> trust someone
>>>>>>>>>>>> to get that close?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Answer yes or no:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No I didn't. I said would he take that chance if it was a set up and
>>>>>> tell the guy to almost hit him. You are just like the MSM, you 
>>>>>> spin and
>>>>>> take out of context. Now tell me how he set it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have to.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just look at the evidence that his ear wasn't shot.
>>>>>
>>>>> On July 26, 2024:
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked
>>>>>     @realDonaldTrump about his bullet wound as they walked to their
>>>>> meeting at Mar-a-lago. Former President Trump showed him where he 
>>>>> was hit.'
>>>>>
>>>>> That's 13 days after he was supposedly hit with a bullet that 
>>>>> "produced
>>>>> a 2 cm wide wound" (that's his personal lackey/doctor Ronny Jackson).
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the pic:
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib? 
>>>>> format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
>>>>>
>>>>> And explain why one of the Secret Service agents rushed to the 
>>>>> stage...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...with a hand towel.
>>>>>
>>>>> How did he know one would be needed? Why would it be a priority to 
>>>>> wipe
>>>>> the blood from Trump's face...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...rather than getting him off the stage as quickly as possible?
>>>>
>>>> They waited until the shooting was over you moron.
>>>
>>> Violating SS standard operating procedures.  Go watch the historical
>>> videos of past presidential shootings; I'm sure they're on Youtube.
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> No
> 
> Keep those eyes covered!

Precisely:  it is willful ignorance on his part...

...and NOT A CULT!  HONEST!  /s


-hh