From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 07:40:06 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vneg28$2k65c$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-29 15:57, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnea9n$2j3hq$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-29 14:17, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vne6g5$2i969$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-29 13:04, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vndklm$28p47$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
> >>>>>>>>>>> to get that close?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Answer yes or no:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Would you?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No I didn't. I said would he take that chance if it was a set up and
> >>>>> tell the guy to almost hit him. You are just like the MSM, you spin and
> >>>>> take out of context. Now tell me how he set it up.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't have to.
> >>>>
> >>>> I just look at the evidence that his ear wasn't shot.
> >>>>
> >>>> On July 26, 2024:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked
> >>>> @realDonaldTrump about his bullet wound as they walked to their
> >>>> meeting at Mar-a-lago. Former President Trump showed him where he was hit.'
> >>>>
> >>>> That's 13 days after he was supposedly hit with a bullet that "produced
> >>>> a 2 cm wide wound" (that's his personal lackey/doctor Ronny Jackson).
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's the pic:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
> >>>>
> >>>> And explain why one of the Secret Service agents rushed to the stage...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...with a hand towel.
> >>>>
> >>>> How did he know one would be needed? Why would it be a priority to wipe
> >>>> the blood from Trump's face...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...rather than getting him off the stage as quickly as possible?
> >>>
> >>> They waited until the shooting was over you moron.
> >>
> >> And how did they KNOW it was over?
> >
> > Radios "shooter down" You know secret service stuff you moron.
>
> From the same people that didn't see the first shooter, you mean?
Nice spin. You asked I answered now you want to move the goalposts.
>
> >>
> >> They relied on the same people who failed to spot the first shooter to
> >> tell them there weren't any others?
> >
> > Now you're just spinning to keep your troll going. It wasn't set up.
> > People died. He's president.
<crickets>