Davin News Server

In article <vneg9j$2k65c$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-29 16:01, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnec9q$2he17$7@dont-email.me>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> On 1/29/25 4:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vndt2j$2gd8l$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/29/25 12:14 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
> >>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
> >>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
> >>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
> >>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
> >>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
> >>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
> >>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
> >>>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
> >>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
> >>>>> was it a set up?
> >>>>
> >>>> Where's the video showing blood splatter before he reached his hand up?
> >>>>
> >>>> What's your explanation for why the evidence in the days after that
> >>>> there was no wound on the ear?
> >>>>
> >>>> There is no evidence that he was struck in the ear that day by a bullet
> >>>> as he has claimed, and there's evidence that the claim isn't credible.
> >>>>
> >>>> For an explanation that fits the known facts, a setup is a possibility.
> >>>> There could be other explanations that also don't require a bullet
> >>>> impact, so go ahead and make your own, less damning suggestion.  Good
> >>>> luck in making them as credible (FYI: a laceration from a flying glass
> >>>> shard also leaves blood dispersion evidence prior to hand-raising).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>>
> >>> They tried to kill him and failed.
> >>
> >> You don't have proof of that.
> > 
> > and you don't have proof they didn't.
> 
> I have the pictures that show his ear wasn't injured:
> 
> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
> 
> >>
> >>> It was not faked.
> >>
> >> The evidence doesn't support what they've told the gullible public.
> > 
> > People died. You are getting stale at this.
> 
> That people died doesn't support that Trump was never hit.

No shit? What a stupid argument.
> 
> >>
> >>> You lost and he won.
> >>
> >> You're trying to change the subject.
> > 
> > Oh the irony. It wasn't faked.
> 
> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>

No set up.