From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:30:58 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-30 06:40, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vneg28$2k65c$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-29 15:57, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vnea9n$2j3hq$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:17, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vne6g5$2i969$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:04, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vndklm$28p47$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get that close?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Answer yes or no:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No I didn't. I said would he take that chance if it was a set up and
>>>>>>> tell the guy to almost hit him. You are just like the MSM, you spin and
>>>>>>> take out of context. Now tell me how he set it up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just look at the evidence that his ear wasn't shot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On July 26, 2024:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked
>>>>>> @realDonaldTrump about his bullet wound as they walked to their
>>>>>> meeting at Mar-a-lago. Former President Trump showed him where he was hit.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's 13 days after he was supposedly hit with a bullet that "produced
>>>>>> a 2 cm wide wound" (that's his personal lackey/doctor Ronny Jackson).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the pic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And explain why one of the Secret Service agents rushed to the stage...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...with a hand towel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did he know one would be needed? Why would it be a priority to wipe
>>>>>> the blood from Trump's face...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...rather than getting him off the stage as quickly as possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> They waited until the shooting was over you moron.
>>>>
>>>> And how did they KNOW it was over?
>>>
>>> Radios "shooter down" You know secret service stuff you moron.
>>
>> From the same people that didn't see the first shooter, you mean?
>
> Nice spin. You asked I answered now you want to move the goalposts.
And I pointed out a HUGE logical hole in your answer.
The Secret Service would NEVER assume that because one shooter was down
that there couldn't possibly be a second one.
Protocol is to get the protectee GONE, ASAP.