From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: WHO Is Trying To Eliminate/Change the 1st and 2nd Amendements and More?
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:52:58 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vngk78$335nh$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-29 21:05, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:06 -0800, Alan says...
> >
> >> Wanting to change an amendment by legal means is not the same thing as
> >> simply abrogating it by fiat.
> >
> > Same outcome... no difference.
>
> HUGE difference.
>
> One method follows the law, the other doesn't.
>
> >
> > If America had nation-wide referendums, and we decided to put it to a vote, to re-word the 14th... it would pass.
> >
> > Today's Supreme Court might be willing to consider it.
>
> You mean the bought-and-paid-for court?
>
> >
> > The 14th is being used by Democrats to bolster its voter rolls.
> The 14th exists.
>
> It guarantees that anyone born in the US is a US citizen.
>
> Don't like it? Fine.
>
> Propose a constitutional amendment to change it. There is a process for
> that.
>
> An executive order is no part of that process.
Shit happens.