From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: WHO Is Trying To Eliminate/Change the 1st and 2nd Amendements and
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:29:01 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-30 14:52, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vngk78$335nh$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-29 21:05, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:06 -0800, Alan says...
>>>
>>>> Wanting to change an amendment by legal means is not the same thing as
>>>> simply abrogating it by fiat.
>>>
>>> Same outcome... no difference.
>>
>> HUGE difference.
>>
>> One method follows the law, the other doesn't.
>>
>>>
>>> If America had nation-wide referendums, and we decided to put it to a vote, to re-word the 14th... it would pass.
>>>
>>> Today's Supreme Court might be willing to consider it.
>>
>> You mean the bought-and-paid-for court?
>>
>>>
>>> The 14th is being used by Democrats to bolster its voter rolls.
>> The 14th exists.
>>
>> It guarantees that anyone born in the US is a US citizen.
>>
>> Don't like it? Fine.
>>
>> Propose a constitutional amendment to change it. There is a process for
>> that.
>>
>> An executive order is no part of that process.
>
> Shit happens.
More platitudes...