From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 15:34:31 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal. Post pics of it at the start, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get. We'll wait.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:Â was it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):Â that's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt. He's just trying to save face while hoping that
>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why would I?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
>>>>>>> still.
>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
>>>>>> part of his kit.
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
>>>>
>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
>>>>
>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
>>>
>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
>>
>> Common sense.
>
> So you really don't know.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
>>>
>>> Radios saying "shooter down" you moron.
>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
>> shooter, doofus?
>
> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
>
>
I'm asking you.
If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?