From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: WHO Is Trying To Eliminate/Change the 1st and 2nd Amendements and More?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:05:15 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vnh1vu$35fbh$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-30 14:52, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vngk78$335nh$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-29 21:05, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:06 -0800, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>> Wanting to change an amendment by legal means is not the same thing as
> >>>> simply abrogating it by fiat.
> >>>
> >>> Same outcome... no difference.
> >>
> >> HUGE difference.
> >>
> >> One method follows the law, the other doesn't.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> If America had nation-wide referendums, and we decided to put it to a vote, to re-word the 14th... it would pass.
> >>>
> >>> Today's Supreme Court might be willing to consider it.
> >>
> >> You mean the bought-and-paid-for court?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The 14th is being used by Democrats to bolster its voter rolls.
> >> The 14th exists.
> >>
> >> It guarantees that anyone born in the US is a US citizen.
> >>
> >> Don't like it? Fine.
> >>
> >> Propose a constitutional amendment to change it. There is a process for
> >> that.
> >>
> >> An executive order is no part of that process.
> >
> > Shit happens.
>
> More platitudes...
You had to look that up huh?