From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: WHO Is Trying To Eliminate/Change the 1st and 2nd Amendements and
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:13:24 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-31 01:05, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vnh1vu$35fbh$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-30 14:52, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vngk78$335nh$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-29 21:05, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:06 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wanting to change an amendment by legal means is not the same thing as
>>>>>> simply abrogating it by fiat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same outcome... no difference.
>>>>
>>>> HUGE difference.
>>>>
>>>> One method follows the law, the other doesn't.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If America had nation-wide referendums, and we decided to put it to a vote, to re-word the 14th... it would pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's Supreme Court might be willing to consider it.
>>>>
>>>> You mean the bought-and-paid-for court?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The 14th is being used by Democrats to bolster its voter rolls.
>>>> The 14th exists.
>>>>
>>>> It guarantees that anyone born in the US is a US citizen.
>>>>
>>>> Don't like it? Fine.
>>>>
>>>> Propose a constitutional amendment to change it. There is a process for
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> An executive order is no part of that process.
>>>
>>> Shit happens.
>>
>> More platitudes...
>
> You had to look that up huh?
You're projecting.