From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: WHO Is Trying To Eliminate/Change the 1st and 2nd Amendements and
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:18:17 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-31 10:09, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:34:00 -0800, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-01-29 21:05, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:01:06 -0800, Alan says...
>>>
>>>> Wanting to change an amendment by legal means is not the same
>>>> thing as simply abrogating it by fiat.
>>>
>>> Same outcome... no difference.
>>
>> HUGE difference.
>>
>> One method follows the law, the other doesn't.
>
> Executive orders aren't lawful?
In contradiction with the clear language of the US constitution?
No, such orders are not lawful.
>
> Says who?
>
> Tell us EXACTLY how what Trump has done is illegal.
Ordered an end to birthright citizenship:
'It is the policy of the United States that no department or agency of
the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United
States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other
governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States
citizenship, to persons: (1) when that personâs mother was unlawfully
present in the United States and the personâs father was not a United
States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said personâs
birth, or (2) when that personâs motherâs presence in the United States
was lawful but temporary, and the personâs father was not a United
States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said personâs
birth.'
>
> Wanna me remind you of past President's executive edicts that were
> deemed illegal?
>
> Just a few to prove a point.
Whataboutism snipped.