From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: USSC Litigation on 14th Amendment - Not What You Think
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 20:13:19 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:15:57 -0800, Alan says...
> ' In United States v. Wong Kim Ark
LOL... the ONE case you're basing your argument on?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Ark was not an illegal alien.
> > There was NO ONE else in mind, mainly, because there was no illegal immigration problem.
> This has been litigated at the USSC level and you're wrong.
Soooo... why didn't you cite ANY?
Oh... NOW you have... BUT FROM 1898!!!!!!
LOL
Once... and in 1898?????!!!!
How many cases and did it involve ILLEGAL immigration and illegal's children?
One?
=====
I'll go first.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United
States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and
residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of
China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.
Mr. Ark and wife were NOT illegal aliens.
Soooo... actually... NONE.
https://i.imgur.com/6BzNSyP.png
LOL
Time to re-write this ambiguous Amendment.
=====
10 Supreme Court Cases About The 14th Amendment
The Slaughter-House Cases (14 Apr 1873) ?In the Slaughter-House Cases, waste products from slaughterhouses located upstream of New Orleans had caused
health problems for years by the time Louisiana decided to consolidate the industries into one slaughterhouse located south of the city.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Plessy v. Ferguson (18 May 1896) ?The Louisiana legislature had passed a law requiring black and white residents to ride separate, but equal, train
cars.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Lochner v. New York (17 Apr 1905) ?Lochner, a baker from New York, was convicted of violating the New York Bakeshop Act, which prohibited bakers from
working more than 10 hours a day and 60 hours a week.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Gitlow v. New York (08 June 1925) ? Before 1925, provisions in the Bill of Rights were not always guaranteed on the local level and usually applied
only to the federal government. Gitlow illustrated one of the Court's earliest attempts at incorporation, that is, the process by which provisions in
the Bill of Rights has been applied to the states.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Brown v. Board of Education (17 May 1954) ?It is impossible to mention the victories of the Civil Rights Movement without pointing to Brown v. Board
of Education. Following the Court's ruling in 1896 of Plessy v. Ferguson, segregation of public schools based solely on race was allowed by states if
the facilities were "equal."
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Mapp v. Ohio (19 Jun 1961) ?What happens when the police obtain evidence from an illegal search or seizure? Before the Court's decision in Mapp, the
evidence could still be collected, but the police would be censured.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Gideon v. Wainwright (18 Mar 1963) ? Before 1962, indigent Americans were not always guaranteed access to legal counsel despite the Sixth Amendment.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Griswold v. Connecticut (07 Jun 1965) ?You know when you're walking down the street at night with lights in front of you and behind you, and you get
that really dark shadow?
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Loving v. Virginia (12 Jun 1967) ?By 1967, 16 states had still not repealed their anti-miscegenation laws that forbid interracial marriages. Mildred
and Richard Loving were residents of one such state, Virginia, who had fallen in love and wanted to get married. Under Virginia's laws, however,
Richard, a white man, could not marry Mildred, a woman of African-American and Native American descent.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (26 Jun 1978)- Allan Bakke, a white man, had been denied access to the University of California
Medical School at Davis on two separate occasions.
Soooo... NOT about illegals having children.