Davin News Server

In article <vnludl$8muv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-30 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vngk1i$335nh$10@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-30 06:40, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vneg28$2k65c$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-29 15:57, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vnea9n$2j3hq$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:17, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vne6g5$2i969$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:04, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vndklm$28p47$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9il1$1f6me$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 17:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9a1h$1c301$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:51, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn990i$1bigg$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 16:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn948e$1acs8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 15:06, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn8k9r$1571u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-25 05:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn129o$2e30l$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 14:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5vi$1oj0a$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No set up. People died. They tried and failed. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it settled that "they" did anything?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're implying a conspiracy without evidence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're the one who said it was set up. That sounds like a conspiracy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, and I've explained some of my reasons for thinking so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you want to turn your scenario from a lone shooter into a "they".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a lone shooter agree to a set up where he could die?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They wouldn't have told him about that part.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you? Idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Almost hit"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds you're admitting Trump's ear wasn't hit at all...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There you go spinning the words again. Typical lib. Answer the question.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said he was "almost hit".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That means he wasn't actually hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not twisting words by me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's a Freudian slip by you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. If it was a set up he would want that. Why would he trust someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get that close?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Answer yes or no:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you write that Trump was "almost hit"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. You are like left wing media. Reread it stupid.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "So you would trust that guy to shoot and almost hit you?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You stated clearly that he "almost hit" Trump.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Which means you understand that DID NOT ACTUALLY HIT HIM.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I said would he take that chance if it was a set up and
> >>>>>>>>> tell the guy to almost hit him. You are just like the MSM, you spin and
> >>>>>>>>> take out of context. Now tell me how he set it up.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't have to.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I just look at the evidence that his ear wasn't shot.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On July 26, 2024:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 'Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked
> >>>>>>>>       @realDonaldTrump about his bullet wound as they walked to their
> >>>>>>>> meeting at Mar-a-lago. Former President Trump showed him where he was hit.'
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's 13 days after he was supposedly hit with a bullet that "produced
> >>>>>>>> a 2 cm wide wound" (that's his personal lackey/doctor Ronny Jackson).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here's the pic:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And explain why one of the Secret Service agents rushed to the stage...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...with a hand towel.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How did he know one would be needed? Why would it be a priority to wipe
> >>>>>>>> the blood from Trump's face...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...rather than getting him off the stage as quickly as possible?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They waited until the shooting was over you moron.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And how did they KNOW it was over?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Radios "shooter down"  You know secret service stuff you moron.
> >>>>
> >>>>    From the same people that didn't see the first shooter, you mean?
> >>>
> >>> Nice spin. You asked I answered now you want to move the goalposts.
> >> And I pointed out a HUGE logical hole in your answer.
> >>
> >> The Secret Service would NEVER assume that because one shooter was down
> >> that there couldn't possibly be a second one.
> >>
> >> Protocol is to get the protectee GONE, ASAP.
> > 
> > Look at you trying to act all knowledgeable. You seem to forget the SS
> > got in a lot of trouble for fucking that up. So now tell us how you
> > think it was set up.
> 
> The SS got in trouble for what, precisely?
> 
> And do you recognize that errors come in different forms and what might 
> be screwed up in one area doesn't automatically mean that everything 
> will be done wrong.
> 
> Protection of person during a threat is the most basic job of the Secret 
> Service, doofus. They would be drilling and drilling and drilling on how 
> to react.

Well they failed. Time for them to go.