From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 10:05:11 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal. Post pics of it at the start, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get. We'll wait.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up: was it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds): that's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt. He's just trying to save face while hoping that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Why would I?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
> >>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
> >>>>>>>>> still.
> >>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
> >>>>>>>> part of his kit.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Common sense.
> >>>
> >>> So you really don't know.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
> >>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
> >>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Radios saying "shooter down" you moron.
> >>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
> >>>> shooter, doofus?
> >>>
> >>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm asking you.
> >>
> >> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
> >> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
> >> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
> >
> > If that's how it goes than yes.
>
> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
>
> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
> detail, you know...
>
> ...you absolutely KNOW...
>
> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
> screwed up.
>
> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
> "target" stay on the site?
>
> No.
There were still bullets flying you dipshit.