Davin News Server

In article <vnohgj$r6nt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-02-02 09:01, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnluk3$8muv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-02-01 10:36, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vnj663$3kjd0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-31 10:17, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/31/25 8:19 AM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 1/31/25 3:58 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vnh7ag$36j2a$4@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/30/25 6:31 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjuc$335nh$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 07:20, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg62$2k65c$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnea81$2j3hq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6jg$2i969$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndtcl$2g0pj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:55, JTEM wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/25 12:22 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not knowing exactly HOW something is done doesn't refute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been done.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Three other people were shot, one of them killed, plus the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assassin. This wasn't a "Staged" shooting, it was a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooting. Two
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead, three wounded, two of those seriously.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if it would keep him out of jail, Trump would point a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun and kill YOU.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just stupid.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is an evil man who doesn't care at all about you, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know it's true.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you know that how?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said it wasn't a shooting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said it was staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that isn't in contradiction with it being staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't know that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The evidence is there that his ear was never hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've shown it to you and you literally said you wouldn't look.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Less than 2 weeks after his supposed "2 cm" hole, you can see a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> picture
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of him pointing at an ear...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...with no sign of damage:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He healed fast.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't want to address this, eh POThead?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's not proven is that it was a shooting intended to kill
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who do you think it was supposed to kill?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't have to have been supposed to kill anyone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. You don't shoot into a crowd of people without hitting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again: Trump doesn't care.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But others just might you dense fool. You think it was just him
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kid? You idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that's progress: you just acknowledge that Trump doesn't care
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say that but like Alan you have to spin what I said.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the doctors at the hospital were in on this as well?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No doctor at the hospital has said anything about actually treating
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump's ear.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> They don't have to. Medical records are private.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Unless the person whose records they are allows them to be released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And saying, "Yes. I worked on Trump's injury" would NOT be private.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Similarly, privacy provision of HIPAA ends when that person dies.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well he ain't dead even though you tried.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not the point.  Point is that your attempt to use HIPAA's privacy shield
> >>>>>>>> as your justification for why there's no medical records as proof of the
> >>>>>>>> sham today will not last forever.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The government leaks like a sieve ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
> >>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
> >>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and if the democrats and their weaponized
> >>>>>>> DOJ had even an inkling that Trump set this up to gain support they would be
> >>>>>>> be all over it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And then there are the number of people at the hospital involved in Trump's care.
> >>>>>>> All the way from surgeons to janitors sweeping the floors.
> >>>>>>> Someone would have leaked this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alan's theory is crazy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
> >>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
> >>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The point is there was no setup.
> >>>> The point is that if it were real, Trump's ear would have shown some damage.
> >>>
> >>> So the bullets and dead guy were fake?
> >>
> >> No. How does that disprove that the shooting of TRUMP could have been
> >> staged.
> >>
> >> What we KNOW is that there is no actual evidence at all that his ear was
> >> actually injured.
> >>
> >> The one statement about it comes from a disgraced doctor who has already
> >> shown he's willing to serve as Trump's lackey, and even his statement
> >> about the size of the wound shows how ridiculous it is to imagine that
> >> it could have been completely healed without a trace after just 13 days.
> > 
> > So he admitted there was a wound.
> 
> No. He CLAIMED there was a wound.
> 
> But the claim is utterly inconsistent with the fact that just 13 days 
> after the supposed wound was inflicted, the ear showed no signs of 
> damage AT ALL

But the doctor said there was a wound. I would believe him before you.