Davin News Server

On 2025-02-02 15:17, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vnohgj$r6nt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-02-02 09:01, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vnluk3$8muv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-01 10:36, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vnj663$3kjd0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-31 10:17, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/31/25 8:19 AM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/31/25 3:58 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnh7ag$36j2a$4@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/30/25 6:31 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjuc$335nh$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 07:20, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg62$2k65c$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnea81$2j3hq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6jg$2i969$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndtcl$2g0pj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:55, JTEM wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/25 12:22 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not knowing exactly HOW something is done doesn't refute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Three other people were shot, one of them killed, plus the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assassin. This wasn't a "Staged" shooting, it was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooting. Two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead, three wounded, two of those seriously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if it would keep him out of jail, Trump would point a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun and kill YOU.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is an evil man who doesn't care at all about you, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know it's true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you know that how?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said it wasn't a shooting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said it was staged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that isn't in contradiction with it being staged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't staged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't know that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The evidence is there that his ear was never hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've shown it to you and you literally said you wouldn't look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Less than 2 weeks after his supposed "2 cm" hole, you can see a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of him pointing at an ear...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...with no sign of damage:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He healed fast.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't want to address this, eh POThead?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's not proven is that it was a shooting intended to kill
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who do you think it was supposed to kill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't have to have been supposed to kill anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. You don't shoot into a crowd of people without hitting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again: Trump doesn't care.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But others just might you dense fool. You think it was just him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kid? You idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that's progress: you just acknowledge that Trump doesn't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say that but like Alan you have to spin what I said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the doctors at the hospital were in on this as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No doctor at the hospital has said anything about actually treating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump's ear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They don't have to. Medical records are private.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless the person whose records they are allows them to be released.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And saying, "Yes. I worked on Trump's injury" would NOT be private.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Similarly, privacy provision of HIPAA ends when that person dies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well he ain't dead even though you tried.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not the point.  Point is that your attempt to use HIPAA's privacy shield
>>>>>>>>>> as your justification for why there's no medical records as proof of the
>>>>>>>>>> sham today will not last forever.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The government leaks like a sieve ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
>>>>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
>>>>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and if the democrats and their weaponized
>>>>>>>>> DOJ had even an inkling that Trump set this up to gain support they would be
>>>>>>>>> be all over it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And then there are the number of people at the hospital involved in Trump's care.
>>>>>>>>> All the way from surgeons to janitors sweeping the floors.
>>>>>>>>> Someone would have leaked this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alan's theory is crazy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
>>>>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
>>>>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The point is there was no setup.
>>>>>> The point is that if it were real, Trump's ear would have shown some damage.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the bullets and dead guy were fake?
>>>>
>>>> No. How does that disprove that the shooting of TRUMP could have been
>>>> staged.
>>>>
>>>> What we KNOW is that there is no actual evidence at all that his ear was
>>>> actually injured.
>>>>
>>>> The one statement about it comes from a disgraced doctor who has already
>>>> shown he's willing to serve as Trump's lackey, and even his statement
>>>> about the size of the wound shows how ridiculous it is to imagine that
>>>> it could have been completely healed without a trace after just 13 days.
>>>
>>> So he admitted there was a wound.
>>
>> No. He CLAIMED there was a wound.
>>
>> But the claim is utterly inconsistent with the fact that just 13 days
>> after the supposed wound was inflicted, the ear showed no signs of
>> damage AT ALL
> 
> But the doctor said there was a wound. I would believe him before you.

If there was a wound...

...a "2 cm" would...

...there would be evidence of it just 13 days later.