Davin News Server

On 2025-02-02 15:24, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-02-02, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <vnohei$r6nt$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>
>>> On 2025-02-02 09:05, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of his kit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Common sense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you really don't know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
>>>>>>>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Radios saying "shooter down"  you moron.
>>>>>>>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
>>>>>>>>> shooter, doofus?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm asking you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
>>>>>>> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
>>>>>>> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that's how it goes than yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
>>>>> detail, you know...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...you absolutely KNOW...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
>>>>> screwed up.
>>>>>
>>>>> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
>>>>> "target" stay on the site?
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> There were still bullets flying you dipshit.
>>>
>>> No. There weren't.
>>>
>>> They stayed too long AFTER the bullets stopped.
>>
>> You really are dumb. Anyway they were most likely DEI hires.
> 
> The overweight SS agent who had problems holstering her weapon surely
> wasn't qualified.
> The way she was holding her weapon I was  surprised it didn't discharge and shoot her in the leg.
> 
> DEI?
> 
> Maybe.
> Doesn't matter. Only the best should be protecting high profile targets.
> 

And you think because someone had a momentary problem holstering a 
weapon you understand whether or not their qualified?

But the point is that protocol is to get the protectee OUT OF THERE. 
Immediately.