Davin News Server

In article <vnp0ma$tml8$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-02-02 15:17, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnohgj$r6nt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-02-02 09:01, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vnluk3$8muv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-02-01 10:36, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vnj663$3kjd0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-31 10:17, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 1/31/25 8:19 AM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/31/25 3:58 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnh7ag$36j2a$4@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/30/25 6:31 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjuc$335nh$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 07:20, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg62$2k65c$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnea81$2j3hq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6jg$2i969$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndtcl$2g0pj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:55, JTEM wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/25 12:22 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not knowing exactly HOW something is done doesn't refute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been done.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Three other people were shot, one of them killed, plus the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assassin. This wasn't a "Staged" shooting, it was a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooting. Two
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead, three wounded, two of those seriously.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if it would keep him out of jail, Trump would point a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun and kill YOU.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just stupid.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is an evil man who doesn't care at all about you, doofus.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know it's true.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and you know that how?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said it wasn't a shooting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You said it was staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that isn't in contradiction with it being staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't staged.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't know that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The evidence is there that his ear was never hit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've shown it to you and you literally said you wouldn't look.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Less than 2 weeks after his supposed "2 cm" hole, you can see a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> picture
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of him pointing at an ear...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...with no sign of damage:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He healed fast.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't want to address this, eh POThead?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTbW98EWoAInOib?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format=jpg&name=4096x4096>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's not proven is that it was a shooting intended to kill
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who do you think it was supposed to kill?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't have to have been supposed to kill anyone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it did. You don't shoot into a crowd of people without hitting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again: Trump doesn't care.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But others just might you dense fool. You think it was just him
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kid? You idiot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that's progress: you just acknowledge that Trump doesn't care
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say that but like Alan you have to spin what I said.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the doctors at the hospital were in on this as well?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No doctor at the hospital has said anything about actually treating
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump's ear.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They don't have to. Medical records are private.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless the person whose records they are allows them to be released.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And saying, "Yes. I worked on Trump's injury" would NOT be private.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Similarly, privacy provision of HIPAA ends when that person dies.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well he ain't dead even though you tried.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Not the point.  Point is that your attempt to use HIPAA's privacy shield
> >>>>>>>>>> as your justification for why there's no medical records as proof of the
> >>>>>>>>>> sham today will not last forever.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The government leaks like a sieve ...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
> >>>>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
> >>>>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and if the democrats and their weaponized
> >>>>>>>>> DOJ had even an inkling that Trump set this up to gain support they would be
> >>>>>>>>> be all over it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And then there are the number of people at the hospital involved in Trump's care.
> >>>>>>>>> All the way from surgeons to janitors sweeping the floors.
> >>>>>>>>> Someone would have leaked this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alan's theory is crazy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sure that's the approach that Alan mentioned, but which Skeeter tried to
> >>>>>>>> claim (incorrectly) that it was a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> its another attempt to try to change the subject, rather than to simply
> >>>>>>>> admit that he was wrong.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The point is there was no setup.
> >>>>>> The point is that if it were real, Trump's ear would have shown some damage.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So the bullets and dead guy were fake?
> >>>>
> >>>> No. How does that disprove that the shooting of TRUMP could have been
> >>>> staged.
> >>>>
> >>>> What we KNOW is that there is no actual evidence at all that his ear was
> >>>> actually injured.
> >>>>
> >>>> The one statement about it comes from a disgraced doctor who has already
> >>>> shown he's willing to serve as Trump's lackey, and even his statement
> >>>> about the size of the wound shows how ridiculous it is to imagine that
> >>>> it could have been completely healed without a trace after just 13 days.
> >>>
> >>> So he admitted there was a wound.
> >>
> >> No. He CLAIMED there was a wound.
> >>
> >> But the claim is utterly inconsistent with the fact that just 13 days
> >> after the supposed wound was inflicted, the ear showed no signs of
> >> damage AT ALL
> > 
> > But the doctor said there was a wound. I would believe him before you.
> 
> If there was a wound...
> 
> ...a "2 cm" would...
> 
> ...there would be evidence of it just 13 days later.

I believe the doctor.