Davin News Server

In article <vnp18u$tml8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-02-02 15:24, pothead wrote:
> > On 2025-02-02, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <vnohei$r6nt$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On 2025-02-02 09:05, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>> In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> part of his kit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Common sense.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So you really don't know.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Radios saying "shooter down"  you moron.
> >>>>>>>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
> >>>>>>>>> shooter, doofus?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm asking you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
> >>>>>>> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
> >>>>>>> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If that's how it goes than yes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
> >>>>> detail, you know...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...you absolutely KNOW...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
> >>>>> screwed up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
> >>>>> "target" stay on the site?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No.
> >>>>
> >>>> There were still bullets flying you dipshit.
> >>>
> >>> No. There weren't.
> >>>
> >>> They stayed too long AFTER the bullets stopped.
> >>
> >> You really are dumb. Anyway they were most likely DEI hires.
> > 
> > The overweight SS agent who had problems holstering her weapon surely
> > wasn't qualified.
> > The way she was holding her weapon I was  surprised it didn't discharge and shoot her in the leg.
> > 
> > DEI?
> > 
> > Maybe.
> > Doesn't matter. Only the best should be protecting high profile targets.
> > 
> 
> And you think because someone had a momentary problem holstering a 
> weapon you understand whether or not their qualified?
> 
> But the point is that protocol is to get the protectee OUT OF THERE. 
> Immediately.

After it is assumed safe you moron.