From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: They're Even ADMITTING It, Stupid
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:24:59 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vnp42s$uamr$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-02-02 16:42, pothead wrote:
> > On 2025-02-03, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >> On 2025-02-02 15:24, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2025-02-02, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article <vnohei$r6nt$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2025-02-02 09:05, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal. Post pics of it at the start, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get. We'll wait.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up: was it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds): that's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt. He's just trying to save face while hoping that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of his kit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Common sense.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So you really don't know.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Radios saying "shooter down" you moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
> >>>>>>>>>>> shooter, doofus?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm asking you.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
> >>>>>>>>> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
> >>>>>>>>> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If that's how it goes than yes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
> >>>>>>> detail, you know...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...you absolutely KNOW...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
> >>>>>>> screwed up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
> >>>>>>> "target" stay on the site?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There were still bullets flying you dipshit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No. There weren't.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They stayed too long AFTER the bullets stopped.
> >>>>
> >>>> You really are dumb. Anyway they were most likely DEI hires.
> >>>
> >>> The overweight SS agent who had problems holstering her weapon surely
> >>> wasn't qualified.
> >>> The way she was holding her weapon I was surprised it didn't discharge and shoot her in the leg.
> >>>
> >>> DEI?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe.
> >>> Doesn't matter. Only the best should be protecting high profile targets.
> >>>
> >>
> >> And you think because someone had a momentary problem holstering a
> >> weapon you understand whether or not their qualified?
> >
> > They train non-stop for that type of operation and it is routine
> > for professionals to be able to holster their weapon.
>
> And even experts screw up now and then.
>
> >
> >
> >> But the point is that protocol is to get the protectee OUT OF THERE.
> >> Immediately.
> >
> > That is correct, which furthers the fact that the SS was completely inept.
> > And they were.
> >
> > Again, the only way this was an inside job is if the DOJ, SS, etc were involved in it
> > and the goal was to neutralize Trump, not wound him.
> >
> > You guys are always calling out Trump as being stupid so all of a sudden you
> > think he planned this to gain support?
> > There is no way.
> >
> > And again the MSM would be all over this if there was even a sniff of this being true.
> > Why aren't they?
> > The MSM hate Trump even more than you libbys do.
> >
> > Like I've said before, I love a good conspiracy theory but this one
> > is ridiculous.
>
> Why did one of the SS agents who rushed on the stage have a hand towel
> to wipe Donald's face?
Because he was bleeding? You dumb ass.
>
> Explain that one.
>
> Explain why a 2cm wound stopped bleeding so quickly that there was no
> blood on Donald's collar.
>
> Hell, he's standing upright with nothing against his ear...
>
> ...AND THERE IS NO BLOOD DRIPPING DOWN THE EAR!
>
> <https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/07/shooting-1200x800.jpg>
>
> Look at that picture.
>
> Just look at it and explain where the blood from a supposed open "2 cm"
> wound is going.
>
> Collar: clean
>
> Ear: clean on the bottom half
You really need help.