Davin News Server

On 2025-02-03 08:24, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vnp42s$uamr$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-02-02 16:42, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-02-03, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-02 15:24, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-02-02, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vnohei$r6nt$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-02-02 09:05, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of his kit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common sense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you really don't know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Radios saying "shooter down"  you moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shooter, doofus?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
>>>>>>>>>>> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
>>>>>>>>>>> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If that's how it goes than yes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
>>>>>>>>> detail, you know...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...you absolutely KNOW...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
>>>>>>>>> screwed up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
>>>>>>>>> "target" stay on the site?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There were still bullets flying you dipshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. There weren't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They stayed too long AFTER the bullets stopped.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are dumb. Anyway they were most likely DEI hires.
>>>>>
>>>>> The overweight SS agent who had problems holstering her weapon surely
>>>>> wasn't qualified.
>>>>> The way she was holding her weapon I was  surprised it didn't discharge and shoot her in the leg.
>>>>>
>>>>> DEI?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe.
>>>>> Doesn't matter. Only the best should be protecting high profile targets.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And you think because someone had a momentary problem holstering a
>>>> weapon you understand whether or not their qualified?
>>>
>>> They train non-stop for that type of operation and it is routine
>>> for professionals to be able to holster their weapon.
>>
>> And even experts screw up now and then.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> But the point is that protocol is to get the protectee OUT OF THERE.
>>>> Immediately.
>>>
>>> That is correct, which furthers the fact that the SS was completely inept.
>>> And they were.
>>>
>>> Again, the only way this was an inside job is if the DOJ, SS, etc were involved in it
>>> and the goal was to neutralize Trump, not wound him.
>>>
>>> You guys are always calling out Trump as being stupid so all of a sudden you
>>> think he planned this to gain support?
>>> There is no way.
>>>
>>> And again the MSM would be all over this if there was even a sniff of this being true.
>>> Why aren't they?
>>> The MSM hate Trump even more than you libbys do.
>>>
>>> Like I've said before, I love a good conspiracy theory but this one
>>> is ridiculous.
>>
>> Why did one of the SS agents who rushed on the stage have a hand towel
>> to wipe Donald's face?
> 
> Because he was bleeding? You dumb ass.

How did they know he'd be bleeding?

>>
>> Explain that one.
>>
>> Explain why a 2cm wound stopped bleeding so quickly that there was no
>> blood on Donald's collar.
>>
>> Hell, he's standing upright with nothing against his ear...
>>
>> ...AND THERE IS NO BLOOD DRIPPING DOWN THE EAR!
>>
>> <https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/07/shooting-1200x800.jpg>
>>
>> Look at that picture.
>>
>> Just look at it and explain where the blood from a supposed open "2 cm"
>> wound is going.
>>
>> Collar: clean
>>
>> Ear: clean on the bottom half
> 
> You really need help.

Look at this one:

https://www.bpmcdn.com/f/files/shared/feeds/gps/2024/07/web1_2024071319070-669307d660536bd2ab3140d8jpeg.jpg;w=960;h=640;bgcolor=000000

Standing up...

...and not a single bit of blood running down from the supposed "wound".