Davin News Server

In article <vnr0hq$1cudm$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-02-03 08:24, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vnp42s$uamr$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-02-02 16:42, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2025-02-03, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 2025-02-02 15:24, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2025-02-02, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vnohei$r6nt$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2025-02-02 09:05, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vnlv0h$8muv$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31 00:56, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vnh2a7$35fbh$11@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 15:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vngjk0$335nh$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 06:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vneg14$2k65c$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 15:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne9gc$2ipf3$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 14:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vne6ko$2i969$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 13:09, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vndo5u$28p8c$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-29 09:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vnc68m$23ceu$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 7:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-28 13:38, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/25 8:12 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vn9ism$1f6me$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-27 18:42, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/25 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmu5t5$1oj0a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 06:07, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vmscdn$1bbau$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what way is showing you that Trump's ear looks EXACTLY THE
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SAME as it did before the supposed shooting...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...speculation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wound heal. Maybe not in Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without a trace... ...no, they don't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plastic surgery. Something above and beyond Canada.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wounds don't heal that thoroughly in <48 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And skin over cartilage heals even slower, if at all: gaps often
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require plastic surgery with skin grafting, which is never
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scar-free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, go give yourself a 5.56mm wide cut that's full depth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and watch how you heal.  Post pics of it at the start, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every 12 hours until you're as scar-free as you think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will ever get.  We'll wait.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you tell me what was really going on. Betcha can't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump staged a fake assassination attempt on his life.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us how he did that or be known as a kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been suggested that a Hollywood blood squib would look
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very much like what transpired.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look for video which reveals *when* the splatter shows up:  was it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present before or after he slapped his own ear?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ballistic wounds have shockwaves which splatter blood at the same rate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the temporary cavity generations (eg, within milliseconds):  that's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far shorter timeline than it takes to physically raise one's hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In any event, "just how" speculations aren't germane to the key point,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is that real wounds just don't heal that fast, and leave evidence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a wound - especially when its supposedly a puncture thru cartilage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a set up. This is settled.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When it comes to ballistics...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...you should listen to this man.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for that, but the basics here are so fundamental that I shouldn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have to invoke any 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate' reminder.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter knows that he's lost, badly, as illustrated by his weak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brush-off attempt.  He's just trying to save face while hoping that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers don't notice that he doesn't have any credible answer for anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet in the mean time you sore losers can't back up your statements. How
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it a set up?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why there was no blood on his collar. None.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't look that close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Explain why a Secret Service agent knew to rush onto the platform with a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small towel in his hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask him. Why don't you tell us?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he knew it would be needed is the obvious answer.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you know what he was thinking? That's pretty good. You're lying but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A Secret Service agent doesn't normally have a white hand towel as a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of his kit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know. I bet they have first aid kits close by.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A first aid kit? Yes, of course.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But that isn't what you bring when you run to cover someone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you work for them? How do you know that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Common sense.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you really don't know.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nor does he take the time to wipe the protectee's face clear of blood in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference to moving them the hell out of there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because they waited until the shooting was over you dumb kook.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can they KNOW the shooting is over?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Radios saying "shooter down"  you moron.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And they could trust that there absolutely could not be a second
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> shooter, doofus?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why don't you ask them idiot?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If you were in charge of the protection of a former president, would you
> >>>>>>>>>>> accept for CERTAIN, that being told the shooter was "down" would
> >>>>>>>>>>> guarantee there couldn't be any other shooters?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If that's how it goes than yes.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What do you even mean "If that's how it goes"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Once the first shot is fired, if you are Trump's direct protection
> >>>>>>>>> detail, you know...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ...you absolutely KNOW...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ...that the people charged with ensuring the security of the site
> >>>>>>>>> screwed up.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And suddenly you're just going to go against protocol and let the
> >>>>>>>>> "target" stay on the site?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There were still bullets flying you dipshit.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No. There weren't.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They stayed too long AFTER the bullets stopped.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You really are dumb. Anyway they were most likely DEI hires.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The overweight SS agent who had problems holstering her weapon surely
> >>>>> wasn't qualified.
> >>>>> The way she was holding her weapon I was  surprised it didn't discharge and shoot her in the leg.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DEI?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe.
> >>>>> Doesn't matter. Only the best should be protecting high profile targets.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> And you think because someone had a momentary problem holstering a
> >>>> weapon you understand whether or not their qualified?
> >>>
> >>> They train non-stop for that type of operation and it is routine
> >>> for professionals to be able to holster their weapon.
> >>
> >> And even experts screw up now and then.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> But the point is that protocol is to get the protectee OUT OF THERE.
> >>>> Immediately.
> >>>
> >>> That is correct, which furthers the fact that the SS was completely inept.
> >>> And they were.
> >>>
> >>> Again, the only way this was an inside job is if the DOJ, SS, etc were involved in it
> >>> and the goal was to neutralize Trump, not wound him.
> >>>
> >>> You guys are always calling out Trump as being stupid so all of a sudden you
> >>> think he planned this to gain support?
> >>> There is no way.
> >>>
> >>> And again the MSM would be all over this if there was even a sniff of this being true.
> >>> Why aren't they?
> >>> The MSM hate Trump even more than you libbys do.
> >>>
> >>> Like I've said before, I love a good conspiracy theory but this one
> >>> is ridiculous.
> >>
> >> Why did one of the SS agents who rushed on the stage have a hand towel
> >> to wipe Donald's face?
> > 
> > Because he was bleeding? You dumb ass.
> 
> How did they know he'd be bleeding?

He go shot.
> 
> >>
> >> Explain that one.
> >>
> >> Explain why a 2cm wound stopped bleeding so quickly that there was no
> >> blood on Donald's collar.
> >>
> >> Hell, he's standing upright with nothing against his ear...
> >>
> >> ...AND THERE IS NO BLOOD DRIPPING DOWN THE EAR!
> >>
> >> <https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/07/shooting-1200x800.jpg>
> >>
> >> Look at that picture.
> >>
> >> Just look at it and explain where the blood from a supposed open "2 cm"
> >> wound is going.
> >>
> >> Collar: clean
> >>
> >> Ear: clean on the bottom half
> > 
> > You really need help.
> 
> Look at this one:
> 
> https://www.bpmcdn.com/f/files/shared/feeds/gps/2024/07/web1_2024071319070-669307d660536bd2ab3140d8jpeg.jpg;w=960;h=640;bgcolor=000000
> 
> Standing up...
> 
> ...and not a single bit of blood running down from the supposed "wound".
So?