From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: LOL - Faggot Won't Address Topic, So... We Get a Whataboutisms
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:27:42 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-13 17:04, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:54:31 -0800, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-02-13 15:48, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> Topic: Female Secret Service Agent Shoots Herself In Leg
>
> A woman special agent trainee on Wednesday shot herself in the leg
> at the Secret Service's Rowley Training Center and was airlifted to
> a Baltimore hospital emergency room, according to multiple sources
> in the Secret Service community.
>
> Developing... I'll provide more details about the circumstances of
> how and why this occurred when they become available.
>
> The incident occurred amid deep concerns that the Secret Service's
> DEI policies contributed to the failures on J13 and created an
> opening for Thomas Crooks to assassinate Trump and kill rallygoer
> Corey Comperatore.
>
> Under the Biden administration's sweeping DEI executive order,
> former Secret Service Dir. Kimberly Cheatle signed onto the 30x30
> national DEI initiative.
>
> It calls for all law enforcement agencies in the country to have at
> least 30% of their forces be women by the year 2030. One of the
> reasons? Because women make fewer arrests. This 30x30 initiative and
> the way Cheatle is implementing it in hiring decisions and training
> qualifications was a major focus of an online petition and its
> whistleblowers" concerns that it was impacting Secret Service
> training, readiness, and performance. This petition was circulating
> BEFORE the assassination attempts against Trump.
>
> I'm told by the time Cheatle left under pressure from Congress after
> J13, she boosted women agents and uniformed officers to 24% - just
> 6% shy of the 30x30 pledge.
>
>> Do you have any information that this happens any less with male trainees?
>
> Off-topic.
Nope. If the subject is "DEI Hire[s]", then you're implying that this
particular trainee was somehow less qualified by virtue of her gender,
aren't you?