From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Budgeted = Stolen
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:14:14 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-14 04:20, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:39:39 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-02-13 04:08, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:37:04 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-12 04:24, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:37:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 10:29, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:39:30 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-10 14:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:08:42 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-08 08:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 05:24:24 -0500, -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compared to Biden's EV initiative where $7.5 billion dollars has built ~10 chargers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you research *why* before making that complaint?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The chargers were promised... the money was taken.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. The money was BUDGETED.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Budgeted" to what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To build many, many chargers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WHERE are the chargers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They WERE in process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They don't just appear overnight.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But we paid for them. Where are they?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. You didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Budgeted" is not the same as "spent".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is it you are this dim?
>>>>>
>>>>> Show us that no money was spent for the chargers.
>>>>
>>>> Notice the subtle shift.
>>>
>>> No shift from me at all.
>>
>> Oh, yes. There was.
>>
>> You now want me to show "NO money" was spent.
>>
>
> That was my position from the beginning so no shift.
>
> Duh.
No. You argued as if ALL the money was spent.
"no money" is not the opposite of "all money".
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying that NO money was spent.
>>>
>>> Show us the products.
>>>
>
> Well?
>
>>>>
>>>> YOU show that ALL the money was spent.
>>>
>>> I didn't claim that.
>>
>> Yeah, you basically did.
>
> Uh no I didn't.
Uh...yeah... ...you did.
"But we paid for them. Where are they?"