From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Budgeted = Stolen
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 08:56:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:14:14 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-02-14 04:20, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:39:39 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-02-13 04:08, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:37:04 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-02-12 04:24, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:37:53 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 10:29, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:39:30 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-10 14:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:08:42 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-08 08:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 05:24:24 -0500, -hh says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compared to Biden's EV initiative where $7.5 billion dollars has built ~10 chargers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you research *why* before making that complaint?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The chargers were promised... the money was taken.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. The money was BUDGETED.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fair enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Budgeted" to what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To build many, many chargers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WHERE are the chargers?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They WERE in process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They don't just appear overnight.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But we paid for them. Where are they?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. You didn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Budgeted" is not the same as "spent".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How is it you are this dim?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show us that no money was spent for the chargers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Notice the subtle shift.
>>>>
>>>> No shift from me at all.
>>>
>>> Oh, yes. There was.
>>>
>>> You now want me to show "NO money" was spent.
>>>
>>
>> That was my position from the beginning so no shift.
>>
>> Duh.
>
>No. You argued as if ALL the money was spent.
>
Ah so you're stupid.
I said very clearly what I meant.
Duh.
>"no money" is not the opposite of "all money".
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not saying that NO money was spent.
>>>>
>>>> Show us the products.
>>>>
>>
>> Well?
Well??
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> YOU show that ALL the money was spent.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't claim that.
>>>
>>> Yeah, you basically did.
>>
>> Uh no I didn't.
>
>Uh...yeah... ...you did.
>
>"But we paid for them. Where are they?"
At what point in funding do you think someone should be required to
produce a product?
You've completely lost this discussion. Just admit it and move on.
>