From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: If Injuns Weren't Included How Were Hispanics Who Weren't Even a
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:01:17 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-15 18:40, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-02-16, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-02-15 17:14, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-02-16, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-15 15:13, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:52:42 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-02-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 21:55:47 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 20:03:18 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not one author was thinking about babies born to
>>>>>>>>>>> illegals.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because at the time there WERE no illegals...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/MePjbdp.mp4
>>>>>>>> Question 1: Was the person born in the US?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question 2: Was the person "subject to the
>>>>>>>> jurisdiction" of the US?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the answer to both is "Yes":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> US citizen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many times have amendments been changed?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Constitution has been amended 27 times, most
>>>>>>> recently in 1992.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is the law of the land UNTIL it is changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> No... "it" is NOT the "law of the land", if they can
>>>>> convince judges that it never applied to illegal alien's
>>>>> babies. They won't even have to change the wording.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The 14th Amendment applied to ex-slaves." - USSC
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye, Mexicans.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tough titty Democrats... you don't get to use Mexicans to
>>>>> bolster your voter roles, no mo.
>>>> That will be hard even for the right's bought-and-paid-for
>>>> justices to do...
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO! Yea, I can see all of those right bought justices
>>> trying to stop Trump's EO right now. Darn you are stupid Alan.
>>
>> Please... ...you know I was replying to the "USSC.
>
> SCOTUS is determined by what party is in power when justices need to
> be replace due to death or retiring. Just because the timing doesn't
> give your side the advantage is no reason to whine. That's the
> system we have. Deal with it.
>
Except when the Republicans block the nominee because it's "too close to
an election"...
...and then confirm a nominee just a couple of WEEKs before an election.